User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; HTC POO_U Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.136 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCPOO U Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 33.0Blink Android 4.0HTCPOO Usmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.0.4HTCPOO Ucloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.136WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.0.4HTCPOO Umobile:smartyescloseclose0.11501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:14 | by ThaDafinser