User agent detail

TwitterAndroid/2.0.1 (122) LG-C550/8 (LGE;hazel;lge;lge_hazel;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGC550 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
TwitterAndroid 2.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Twitter closeAndroid 2.0.1LGOptimus Chatmobile-browseryescloseclose0.34604 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LGhazelsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.0.1LGC550closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android LGLGC550closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Twitter Android 2.0.1LGOptimus Chatmobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:14 | by ThaDafinser