User agent detail

Vodafone/1.0/HTC_Diamond Opera/9.50 (Windows NT 5.1; U; de)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Opera Mobile 9.50Windows Mobile HTCTouch Diamondmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 9.50Presto 2.2 HTCDiamondMobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 9.50closeWindows 5.1HTCTouch Diamondmobile-browseryescloseclose0.17602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.50Presto Windows XPHTCDiamond Operasmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.50closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.50closeWindows XP HTCDiamond Operacloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.50closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.50 Windows Windows NT 5.1HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.50 Windows Mobile HTCTouch Diamondmobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close HTCDiamondFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:13 | by ThaDafinser