User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 2.1-update1; xx; C8500; 240*320) UCWEB8.2.2.135/145/800
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 8.2Android 2.1 HuaweiC8500mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.2WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.2closeAndroid 2.1.0closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 8.2.2.135closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.2.135 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2 Android 2.1HuaweiC8500mobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:13 | by ThaDafinser