User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Lenovo A3500-H Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
Chrome 31.0Android 4.2unknown LenovoA7-50 A3500 Wi-Fi + 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.2LenovoA7-50 A3500 Wi-Fi + 3GTabletyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.2LenovoA3500-Hsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA3500-Hcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink Android 4.2.2LenovoIdeaTab A3500tabletyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 31closeAndroid 4.2LenovoA3500-HTabletyesyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:13 | by ThaDafinser