User agent detail

GoogleEarth/7.1.0003.1255(Android;Android (LG-E986-geefhd-user-4.1.2);de-DE;kml:2.2;client:Free;type:default)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGE986 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle BotBot/Crawler0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
GoogleEarth 7.1.0003.1255closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid LGOptimus G Promobile-browseryescloseclose0.26703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android LGE986smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid LGE986closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android LGLGE986closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Google Earth 7.1 Android 4.1.2LGOptimus G Promobile:smartyescloseclose0.04201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.053 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:13 | by ThaDafinser