User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; en-US) AppleWebKit/523+ (KHTML, like Gecko) AdobeAIR/1.5 Community Help Client 1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Adobe AIR 1.5Win32 unknownunknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Adobe AIR 1.5WebKit Win32 Windows DesktopDesktop0.09 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 523closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Adobe AIR runtime 1.5closeWindows software-librarycloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Adobe AIR 1.5WebKit 523Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
AdobeAIR 1.5Webkit 523Windows desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:12 | by ThaDafinser