User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.3; v89_jdt1fwvga Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Xianghev89_jdt1fwvg Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.066 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.2.3GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 31.0Blink Android 4.2smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.2.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.2.3Xianghev89_jdt1fwvgcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink Android 4.2.3v89_jdt1fwvgamobile:smartyescloseclose0.07901 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.048 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:11 | by ThaDafinser