User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; GT-P3100 Build/KTU84P) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.96 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 41.0Android 4.4unknown SamsungGalaxy Tab 2 7.0Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.4SamsungGalaxy Tab 2 7.0Tabletyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeAndroid 4.4.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.27203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.4SamsungGALAXY Tab 2 7"tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 41.0.2272closeAndroid 4.4.4SamsungGT-P3100closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.96WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.4Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Android 4.4.4SamsungGalaxy Tab 2 (7.0)tabletyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 41closeAndroid 4.4SamsungGT-P3100Tabletyesyescloseclose0.072 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:11 | by ThaDafinser