User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Pt-br; aplix jblend) UCBrowser8.3.0.154/69/444/UCWEB Mobile, MOT-A3100/1.0 Release/09.09.2008 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Software/WM6.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaA3100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.165 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.3 MotorolaA3100smartphoneyes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0close MotorolaA3100closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.3.0.154 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.3Gecko Windows Mobile MotorolaA3100mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:11 | by ThaDafinser