User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; AFTB Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.173 Mobile Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-681.php
Chrome 25.0Android 4.2unknown AmazonFire TVTV Device Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.2AmazonFire TVTV Device0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.173closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364.173closeAndroid 4.2.2AmazonFire TVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.24602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 25.0WebKit Android 4.2AmazonFire TVtvyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.173closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.2.2AFTBcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.173WebKit 537.22Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Amazon WebView Webkit 537.22FireOS 3AmazonFire TVtelevisioncloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.173closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 25closeAndroid 4.2AmazonFire TVSmart-TVyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:11 | by ThaDafinser