User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; ThL W3+ (Dual Core) Build/IMM76I) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Mobile Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ThlW3+ (Dual Core) Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.096 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 18.0WebKit Android 4.0ThLW3+ (Dual Core)smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.0.4ThlW3+ (Dual Core)closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose1.0411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.4THLW3+mobile:smartyescloseclose0.034 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.062 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:11 | by ThaDafinser