User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; en-US; BLU_Touch_Book_7.0_LITE Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1 UCBrowser/8.6.0.276 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
BluTouch_Book_7.0_LITE Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.6WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.08 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.6WebKit Android 4.0yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.6.0closeAndroid 4.0.4BluTouch_Book_7.0_LITEcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.09401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.6.0.276WebKit 528.5Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.6Webkit 528.5Android 4.0.4BLUTouch Book 7.0 Litetabletyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:10 | by ThaDafinser