User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.1.0.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Dragon 31.1Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dragon 31.1Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.063 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.1.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.1.0.0closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.1Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.1.0.0closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.1.0closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 31.1.0.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.1.0.0WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 31.1.0.0Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.1.0.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:10 | by ThaDafinser