User agent detail

SonyEricssonT250a/R5CA005 TelecaBrowser/1.1.14.20
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonT250a Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonT250a R5CA005closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo 1.1.14.20close Sony EricssonT250amobile-browseryescloseclose0.26003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Sony EricssonT250afeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close SonyEricssonT250acloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo 1.1.14.20close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson T250acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo 1.1 Sony EricssonT250amobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonT250aFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:09 | by ThaDafinser