User agent detail

OneBrowser/3.1 (SAMSUNG-S3550/XXJD5)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungS3550 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
OneBrowser 3.1WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
OneBrowser 3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
OneBrowser 3.1close SamsungS3550mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ONE Browser 3.1WebKit SamsungS3550smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
ONE Browser 3.1close SamsungS3550closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
OneBrowser 3.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OneBrowser 3.1 SamsungS3550mobile:featureyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:08 | by ThaDafinser