User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; KFTHWI Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2203.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/tablet/os-fireos.yaml
Amazon WebView FireOS 4Blink 537.36AmazonKindle Fire HDXtabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.065 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2203.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 40.0.2203.0closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.4AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7" WiFitabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2203.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 40.0.2203closeAndroid 4.4.2AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7" WiFicloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.13801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 40.0.2203.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.58506 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Amazon WebView Blink FireOS 4AmazonKindle Fire HDXtabletyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2203.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 40closeAndroid 4.4AmazonKFTHWITabletyesyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:08 | by ThaDafinser