User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; PowerPC MorphOS 3.2; Odyssey Web Browser; rv:1.21) AppleWebKit/537.33 (KHTML, like Gecko) OWB/1.21 Safari/537.33
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-morphos.yaml
Odyssey 1.21MorphOS 3.2Webkit 537.33desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.33closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 537.33closeMorphOS desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Odyssey Web Browser 1.21WebKit MorphOS 3.2desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 537.33Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Odyssey 1.21Webkit 537.33MorphOS 3.2desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:08 | by ThaDafinser