User agent detail

Android 4.1.1;AppleWebKit/534.30;Build/JRO03C;AQUILA 097-1016 BT 3G Build/JRO03C
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
CmxAQUILA 097-1016 BT 3G Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1AQUILA 097-1016 BT 3Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.285 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.1closeAndroid 4.1.1CmxAQUILA 097-1016 BT 3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 534.30Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.1AQUILA 097-1016 BT 3Gtabletyescloseclose0.11601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.086 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:06 | by ThaDafinser