User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64) AppleWebKit/601.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/8.0 Safari/601.1 Ubuntu/15.04 (3.14.2-0ubuntu1) Epiphany/3.14.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
GNOME Web 3.14.2Ubuntu 15.04Webkit 601.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Epiphany 3.14WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Epiphany 3.14.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.224 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Epiphany 3.14WebKit Ubuntu 15.04desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 8.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 3.14.2closeUbuntu 15.4closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Epiphany 3.14.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Epiphany 3.14.2WebKit 601.1Linux 15.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
GNOME Web 3.14.2Webkit 601.1Ubuntu 15.04desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:06 | by ThaDafinser