User agent detail

Vodafone/1.0/HTC_DesireS/2.10.161.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDesireS Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Vodafone 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close HTCDesireSmobile-browseryescloseclose0.486 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
HTCDesireSsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCDesireScloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
HTC Desire Scloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
HTCDesireSmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile HTC_DesireScloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:03 | by ThaDafinser