User agent detail

Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
yesGoogle BotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle BotBot/Crawler0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Googlebot 2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesGooglebotclose0.249 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotCrawler0.095 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Googlebot 2.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.462 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGooglebotclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:02 | by ThaDafinser