User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) KHTML/4.8.2 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-konqueror.yaml
Konqueror 4.8Linux KHTML 4.8.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.8KHTML 4.8Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.8closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.8KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.8closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.092 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.8 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.38 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.8KHTML 4.8.2Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:02 | by ThaDafinser