User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Tizen 2.0; xx; GT-I8800) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile TizenBrowser/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-tizen.yaml
Samsung Browser 2.0Tizen 2.0Webkit 537.1Samsung"Melius"mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
TizenBrowser 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Tizen 2.0SamsungGT-I8800smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux SamsungGT-I8800closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.088 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 537.1Linux Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung Browser 2.0Webkit 537.1Tizen 2.0Samsung"Melius"mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 2.0closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:02 | by ThaDafinser