User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-I9008L_TD/1.0 Android/2.2.1 Release/12.15.2010 Browser/AppleWebKit533.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
Android Browser Android 2.2.1WebKit SamsungGALAXY Ssmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-I9008L closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.2.1SamsungGalaxy Smobile-browseryescloseclose0.263 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2SamsungGALAXY Ssmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.2.1SamsungGT-I9008Lcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.2.1SamsungGalaxy Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.2closeAndroid 2.2SamsungGT-I9008LSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:02 | by ThaDafinser