User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win16; en-US; rv:1.7) Safari/85.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows 3.1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 85.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.7closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Windows desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeWindows 3.1 closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows 16 closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Windows desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:01 | by ThaDafinser