User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; zh-CN; vivo S11t Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.5.1.381 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
vivoS11t Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U3 Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.11601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4VivoS11tmobile-browseryescloseclose0.322 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5WebKit Android 4.0VivoVivo S11tsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.1closeAndroid 4.0.4vivoS11tcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.1.381WebKit 533.1Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Webkit 533.1Android 4.0.4VivoS11mobile:smartyescloseclose0.034 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:01 | by ThaDafinser