User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; JXD-S6600-M6 Build/S6600-M6-01-20121218CN) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.64 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
JXDS6600-M6 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.10101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 28.0.1500.64closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.279 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 28.0Blink Android 4.1smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.1.1JXDS6600-M6closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose1.506 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.64WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 28.0.1500.64Blink Android 4.1.1JXD-S6600-M6mobile:smartyescloseclose0.14301 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:00 | by ThaDafinser