User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 4.0.3; xx; HTC T328w; 480*800) UCWEB8.7.2.214/145/800
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 8.7Android 4.0.3 HTCDesire Vmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.7WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux HTCA810emobile-browseryescloseclose0.266 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.7 GNU/Linux HTCT328wsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.2closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCT328wcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 8.7.2.214closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.2.214 Linux HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.7 Android 4.0.3HTCDesire Vmobile:smartyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:00 | by ThaDafinser