User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Odyssey Web Browser; AROS; rv:1.16) AppleWebKit/535.14 (KHTML, like Gecko) OWB/1.16 Safari/535.14
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-aros.yaml
Odyssey 1.16AROS Webkit 535.14desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 535.14closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 535.14closeAROS desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Odyssey Web Browser 1.16WebKit 0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 535.14 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.445 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Odyssey 1.16Webkit 535.14AROS desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:59 | by ThaDafinser