User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; xx; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20111121 Gentoo Firefox/3.6.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 3.6.22Gentoo Gecko 1.9.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.22closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.22closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Gentoo desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.22closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.22closeGentoo closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.22closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.22Gecko 20111121Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.22Gecko 1.9.2Gentoo desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.22closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:59 | by ThaDafinser