User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux 3.13.0-30-generic) KHTML/4.13.2 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-konqueror.yaml
Konqueror 4.13Linux KHTML 4.13.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.13KHTML 4.13Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.038 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.13closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.13KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.13closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.13closeLinux 3.13.0closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.13closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.13 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.13KHTML 4.13.2Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:59 | by ThaDafinser