User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; en; NokiaC6-01) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.5.0.449 U2/1.0.0 Mobile 3gpp-gba
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.5JAVA unknownunknown NokiaC6-01Mobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U2 JAVA NokiaC6-01Mobile Phoneyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close NokiaC6-01mobile-browseryescloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5 Symbian NokiaC6-01smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 1.0.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.0close NokiaC6-01closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.0.449 NokiaOS NokiaNokia C6-01closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Gecko Series60 NokiaC6-01mobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close NokiaC6-01Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:58 | by ThaDafinser