User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; myTab10 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.136 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MytabmyTab10 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.279 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.0tabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.0.4MytabmyTab10closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.136WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.0.4myTab10tabletyescloseclose0.11701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:58 | by ThaDafinser