User agent detail

MID7500 Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
OmegaMID7500 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS 5.0.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 5.1WebKit iOS 5.0AppleiPadtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.1closeiOS 5.0.1closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS 5.0.1OmegaMID7500closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1closeiPhone OS 5.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari 5.1WebKit 534.46iOS 5.0.1AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 534.46iOS 5.0.1AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS 5.0AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.043 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:58 | by ThaDafinser