User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S3970_TD/1.0 RTK-E/1.0 SHP/VPP-R5 Release/04.20.2011 Browser/Dolfin2.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 SMM-MMS/1.2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-dolfin.yaml
Dolfin 2.1 SamsungGT-S3970mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-S3970 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolfin 2.1close SamsungGT-S3970mobile-browseryescloseclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin WebKit SamsungGT-S3970smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungGT-S3970closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 2.1 SamsungGT-S3970mobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:58 | by ThaDafinser