User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Superbird/31.0.1651.1 Chrome/31.0.1651.1 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
SuperBird 31.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SuperBird 31.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1651.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Superbird 31.0.1651.1closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1651.1closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1651closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 31.0.1651.1closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1651.1WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Superbird 31.0Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1651.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:57 | by ThaDafinser