User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) KHTML/4.11.4 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.11 Fedora/4.11.4-1.fc20
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 4.11Fedora 20KHTML 4.11.4desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.11KHTML 4.11Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.07601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.11closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.11KHTML Fedora 4.11desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.11closeFedora 4.11.4closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.11 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.11KHTML 4.11.4Fedora 20desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:57 | by ThaDafinser