User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 Opera/9.5 (KDDI-SH3F; BREW; Opera Mobi; U; ja) Presto/2.2.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/mobilephone_au.yaml
Opera SH3Fau mobilephone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile close Opera SoftwareOperamobile-browseryescloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.5Presto Brew KDDISH3Ffeature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 9.5closeBREW closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.5Presto 2.2.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.5Presto 2.2.1Brew SharpSH005mobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera SH3Fcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile 10.00close KDDITS3OFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:56 | by ThaDafinser