User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; zh-CN; C1505 Build/11.3.A.2.33) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.0.2.299 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.0Android 4.1unknown SonyXperia EMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.0U3 Android 4.1SonyXperia EMobile Phoneyesyes0.08601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.0.2.299closeAndroid 4.1.1SonyC1505mobile-browseryescloseclose0.307 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.0WebKit Android 4.1SonyXperia Esmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.0.2closeAndroid 4.1.1SonyC1505closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.0.2.299WebKit 534.31Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.0Webkit 534.31Android 4.1.1SonyXperia Emobile:smartyescloseclose0.045 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.1SonyC1505Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:55 | by ThaDafinser