User agent detail

PhilipsX830/1.0 MTK6239/08A Release/11.11.2008 Browser/Obigo2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PhilipsX830 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
PhilipsX830 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM PhilipsX830mobile-browseryescloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo MTK / Nucleus PhilipsX830smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 2.0close PhilipsX830closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo 2.0 PhilipsX830mobile:featureyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close PhilipsX830Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:54 | by ThaDafinser