User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.2; Trident/4.0; Media Center PC 4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 3.0.04320)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-301.php
IE 8.0WinXP 5.24.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 8.0Trident 4.0WinXP 5.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.09401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 8.0closeWindows 5.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.21 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows Server 2003desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 8.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows Server 2003 closecloseclosecloseclose0.183 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Server 2003desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 8(Compatibility View)closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:54 | by ThaDafinser