User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0) METASpider
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
METASpider Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.5Trident Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.5closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.211 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesMETASpiderclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.5Trident Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:53 | by ThaDafinser