User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; Google Web Preview) Chrome/27.0.1453 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-460.php
yesGoogle Web PreviewBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle Web PreviewBot/Crawler0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 27.0.1453closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 27.0.1453closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.109 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGoogle Web Previewclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGoogle Web Previewclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 27.0.1453closeMac OS X 10.7.3Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:53 | by ThaDafinser