User agent detail

Cooliris/1.3 CFNetwork/342.1 Darwin/9.4.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
iOS 1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Cooliris 1.3WebKit Darwin AppleMacintoshDesktop0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Cooliris 1.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeiOS 1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 342.1closeiOS 1Applecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iris Browser 1.3 Windows Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iPhone OS 1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:52 | by ThaDafinser