User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Powermarks/3.5; Windows 95/98/2000/NT)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
yesPowermarksBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesPowermarksBot/Crawler0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows 4.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 95desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.0closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.0 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:52 | by ThaDafinser