User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20140210 Firefox/24.0 Iceweasel/24.3.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Iceweasel 24.3Linux unknown24.0 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Iceweasel 24.3Gecko 24.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.06301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 24.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IceWeasel 24.3.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.217 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Iceweasel 24.3Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 24.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iceweasel 24.3.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iceweasel 24.3.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.122 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iceweasel 24.3.0Gecko 20140210Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iceweasel 24.3.0Gecko 24.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 24.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 24.0closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:52 | by ThaDafinser