User agent detail

Opera/9.70 (Linux armv6l ; U; CE-HTML/1.0 NETTV/2.0.2; xx) Presto/2.2.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/philips.yaml
Opera Devices 9.7 Presto 2.2.1PhilipsNet TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.70closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.70closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.70Presto GNU/Linux PhilipsNetTV Seriestv0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.70closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.70closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.70closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.70Presto 2.2.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.422 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 9.7Presto 2.2.1 PhilipsNet TVtelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.70closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:52 | by ThaDafinser