User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Symbian OS; Nokia 6681/4.00.15; 6936) Opera 8.50 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6681 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.50closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.50Presto Symbian OS Nokia6681smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.50closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.50closeSymbian OS Nokia6681closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.50closeSymbian OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.50 Symbian Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 8.50 Series60 Nokia6681mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Nokia6681Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:50 | by ThaDafinser