User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD) AppleWebKit/535.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.133 Safari/535.22 Midori/0.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-midori.yaml
Midori 0.5FreeBSD Webkit 535.22desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit FreeBSD Desktop0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Midori 0.5closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Midori 0.5WebKit FreeBSD desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Midori 0.5closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Midori 0.5WebKit 535.22FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Midori 0.5Webkit 535.22FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:50 | by ThaDafinser